Business

...now browsing by category

 

Black to the future

Monday, October 12th, 2009

I’ve posted here periodically about my enthusiasm for Blackberry, specifically the Bold 9000 that I’ve had since the beginning of the year. One of the reasons I held on to my old 7100 for so long was that I was waiting for Telstra to release a NextG Blackberry, which they finally did. And then I was mulling over whether to get the Bold or the Storm, a decision which was ultimately made for me by Vodafone’s exclusivity with the Storm in Australia.

Of course, during this period I didn’t use the 7100 as a primary device – at least I hadn’t for quite a while. Instead I’d revolved through the Locatrix handset de jour – whether it be an iPhone, N95, or whatever – as my primary handset. The Blackberry was only a secondary device, for the sole purpose of e-mail. And then in February I migrated to the Bold as my sole device, and its been mostly a happy marriage.

However I have been travelling so much this year and – quite belatedly – working with local SIM cards to reduce roaming costs wherever I can. This has meant, however, that I’m accumulating a shed full of “other” numbers which I maintain active, and use whenever I’m in the relevant country. This week, for example is a HKCSL 3G prepaid service, which I’ve had in my trusty E51.

Ironically, this has meant that I’m back to a dual-device personality – being as attached to e-mail as I am, the Blackberry is usually in my pocket. But locally working with the Hong Kong number – we’ve got an office DID here now, so its how I’m connecting with the team in Australia to save money – I’m carrying and using a second phone. As a primary device, this week, anyway.

So ironically, it’s Black to the future – despite my passion for the Blackberry solution, it’s still not meeting every use case I come up with.

So any plans for dual SIM devices, Research in Motion?

A blog post is…..

Sunday, October 4th, 2009

Forthcoming, I promise.

I’ve been somewhat distracted in the past few weeks; there’s no one specific area that’s had me swamped, just the general pressure of the business – it’s a tough commercial environment, in case you haven’t noticed – and optimistically planning for a new phase of growth in 2010.

There have been however a number of topics I’m keen to write up: one is my recent endeavors with SIP, VoIP, and Asterisk in particular (I’ve become a big fan). I also want to put up a post about some of the “initiatives” I’ve seen from so-called “leading” VCs in Australia lately.

On a serious note, Mother Nature has given the South Pacific, India and Indonesia an absolute battering in these past few weeks, and my thoughts are with those who have friends and family in peril, pain, or uniquely challenging situations as a result.

And finally, I want to start bragging about a number of initiatives we’ve been cooking up in the labs of late, which is one of the things fueling my optimism for the next calendar year.

So its Sunday night, October 4th, and I’m going to plan a blog entry each day this week.  Stay tuned.

Why Matthew Robson is Right

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

I’ve been reading with interest the reaction to Morgan Stanley’s publication of the research results of their 15-year old intern, Matthew Robson.

While I’m sure that he didn’t actually learn all about banking in a week – as alleged in the FT article – it’s been amazing to read what everyone else has written about the report Morgan Stanley published, which was subsequently posted and blogged over ad infinitum in the past week. Click to continue »

Because it’s Singapore

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

I’m spending a few days this week in Singapore – I think this is my fourth visit so far this year. I spent a lot of time here in the late ’90’s with Tandem and then Compaq, so remain pretty familiar with the island.

It has been interesting to take stock of the economic situation up here; while I’m somewhat detached from the rigours of the local property market, there are some telling signs that Singapore is as challenged as most other countries by the GFC, yet better-equipped to deal with it. Firstly, the government announced yesterday that it was way ahead of its public service recruitment goals for the next two years, and unusually for Singapore, was making quite a number of mid-career appointments – usually public service recruitment is restricted to new graduates. One can only suggest this acceleration is at least in part due to a higher than planned unemployment rate in the private sector.

Secondly, it was telling to hear of Chip Goodyear’s sudden withdrawal from the CEO-in-waiting position at Temasek, with Ho Ching remaining as Executive Director and CEO.  And this despite a multi-year, well documented succession process. The Straits Times remains coy on the reasons, quoted as “strategic differences” between Mr Goodyear and the board. But as one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, I can’t help but wonder if its a case of the board now simply wanting to maintain the status quo with the proven – and politically safer – existing leadership team.

Finally, I’ve been continually fascinated with efforts the government makes to stimulate progress in the technological and innovation sense; part economical, part through piloting fresh initiatives and seeking private companies who can deliver and lead public technology efforts. We’re aiming for involvement in several of these projects, and while time will tell whether or not we are successful, I think it will be far from my last visit to the island republic in 2009.

On the downside, it’s raining this morning, and sans umbrella, I have no idea how I am going to get to my meetings without getting soaked. Because it’s Singapore, of course – and that’s what happens here. And I love it.

Where is Australian Business Media on Innovation?

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

A few weeks back I blogged about the perceived implementation delays surrounding Minister Kim Carr’s 18th March 2009 announcement of up to $83 million to early stage companies who have been “starved of funds due to the global financial crisis”.

Its coming up to three months since the announcement date, and it appears that neither the Minister nor the licensed venture capital fund managers have any specific knowledge on when and how the program will be initiated, much less on when the funding will actually flow to qualifying companies.

The Minister’s own press release said this funding was critical: “If we lose these innovative companies we will never get them back”.

A stated benefit of the fund was that “making money available will boost confidence and help shake loose additional private sector capital”. It stands to reason therefore that by not implementing the so-called Innovation Investment Follow-on Fund (IIFF) we will lose companies, we will lose those (apparently valued by the Minister) “high-skill, high-wage” jobs.

So where is the Australian media on this? If Apple, or another US multinational so much as hinted of a new product, and then delayed the launch, Australian business and technology journalists would be wailing about the wait each day.

C’mon folks – you know who you are. How about asking a few questions for the sake of Australian Innovation?

Switch to our mobile site